MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2923615937 · doi:10.26512/lstr.v3i1.21666

O papel dos Pontos de Troca de Tráfego em políticas e regulação da banda larga

2011· article· pt· W2923615937 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLaw State and Telecommunications Review · 2011
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicBusiness and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPeeringBusinessPhilosophyComputer scienceThe InternetOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Novos investimentos em infraestrutura de redes de transporte (backbones) para a internet e a necessidade de trocar tráfego com backbones existentes, tanto na modalidade de trânsito como na de peering, indicam a crescente relevância de um elemento-chave nessa arquitetura – o Ponto de Troca de Tráfego (PTT). Há muito poucos PTT disponíveis hoje em dia, principalmente se considerado o vertiginoso crescimento no número de sistemas autônomos anunciados. Os PTT implantados por redes de pesquisa demonstram que um acréscimo expressivo no número desses pontos teria o efeito de melhorar a topologia da internet, aumentar a conectividade, reduzir a latência e o custo de troca de tráfego. Adicionalmente, os PTT podem ser o local mais eficiente para a oferta de determinados serviços. Este trabalho aborda as possibilidades de ação regulatória para estimular a implementação dos PTT e para assegurar que seus benefícios sejam amplamente compartilhados.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.931
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.151
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it