Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Our understanding of the role of innovation in economic growth has been deepening since the pioneering work of Schumpeter. In Schumpeter’s view, innovative entry by entrepreneurs is the disruptive force that sustains economic growth. Particularly, innovation drives economic growth in a process of creative destruction, with the growth of emerging firms often challenging the dominance of established companies. Given the significance of the tensions between innovation and incumbency, it is surprising that little literature has explored the topic. This gap in the literature has clearly been noted by the author, stating that ‘Much of the subject matter in this book is not the focus of academic research. Science and technology studies only make passing references to the topic. Similarly, social studies of technology pay occasional attention to resistance to innovation. Most marketing studies view the topic as adoption failures.’ In this sense, Innovation and Its Enemies has contributed to the literature by developing this field as a distinctive area of scholarly endeavour.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it