Geocide, Ecocide, and Genocidal Type Outcomes from Large-Scale Open Pit Mountaintop Gold Mining in the Outskirts of Paracatu, Brazil
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 1987, large-scale open pit mountaintop gold mining was initiated in the outskirts of the Paracatu town, Minas Gerais, Brazil. The mine hard rocks contain low-grade gold ore (average 0.4 g gold/ton ore) and abnormally high amounts of arsenopyrite (FeAsS; average 1000 g/ton ore). Since 2005, the mine has been operated solely by Canadian Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC-NYSE, K-TSX) through its local subsidiary. The poorly controlled mining activities release FeAsS and its weathering products from the rocks as particulate matter, gas, and solutes that contaminate the air, soils, surface water and ground water. As of 2016, the cumulative inorganic arsenic throughput of the mine was estimated at 735,000 ton. In this article, we present the first series of sentinel cases of chronic arsenic intoxication (CAsI) in Paracatu. Despite mounting evidence for wanton widespread environmental degradation, large-scale environmental contamination, chronic mass intoxication, and persistent human rights abuse, a number of public and private lawsuits failed to halt Kinross' activities in Paracatu. The ongoing environmental and humanitarian disaster and unlawful abuses in Paracatu that degrade the environment and victimize thousands of people have prospered unchallenged and cannot be stopped locally due to officials' collusion with large economic interests, powerful political interferences, facilitation payments, willful blindness, and toxicological greenwashing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it