MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2923737575

The Acquisition of Internet Enhanced Learning Tools in Schools Today

2019· article· en· W2923737575 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicOnline and Blended Learning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe InternetComputer scienceMultimediaInternet privacyWorld Wide Web
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

single parent family, the cost for restitution may approach $ U. S. dollars depending on the device.This investigation therefore, as one of the key issues, concentrated on how devices are obtained and maintained in a fair and equal manner.the research discovered that many individual schools and districts have had to come up with their own specific solutions to settle the dilemma.Monies from bonds or specific levies are usually required in the instance of public schools.Private schools on the other hand have had to come up with their own unique arrangements.This small sampling is prevalent to the current situation in many schools throughout the U. S. and may also be comparable to various schools throughout the world.Each of these case studies was rationalized so that readers can come away with a deeper understanding of the problem that exists today.Hopefully, this research will assist those who are exploring workable methods that may be appropriate for their own instructional and learning environments.As mentioned previously, three case studies were explored to ascertain how technological devices were obtained for their student populace.In this context 'technological devices' were assumed to be either portable devices such as I-pads or tablet computers.Mobile devices such as Smart Phones were not included but certainly with their expanded usage among the general population any further research would have to include such computing tools.At the time of this research many schools still have restrictions in place as to the possession and use of Smart Phones on school grounds.The precise case studies involving portable devices were two private senior high schools and one large public-school district.All three instances were located within the Portland-Vancouver metropolitan area of Oregon and Washington states in the United Stated of America.Vancouver, Washington is located across the Columbia river and is easily accessible by car from the Oregon side.All three cases were located within an hour of each other.Numerous electronic correspondences were

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score0.388

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it