MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2923811316 · doi:10.32370/ia_2019_01_16

The Role of the Coloristic Solution in the Modern Art as a Constituent Part of the Tapestry

2019· article· en· W2923811316 on OpenAlex
Zinaida Borisyuk, Bogaychuk

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIntellectual Archive · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicDiverse Scientific Research in Ukraine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComposition (language)SketchContext (archaeology)ArtAestheticsVisual artsComputer scienceLiteratureHistoryArchaeologyAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article is devoted to the role of the coloristic solution in contemporary art and the problem of the coloristic solution of the tapestry composition. It is indicated that the need for a deeper and more comprehensive study of the art of tapestry is due to the fact that the modern art of the 21st century is characterized by the search for a new coloristic composition solution, which is also associated with a certain shift in the boundaries between its individual types and genres. Poorly lit parts of the problem are identified. Since a modern tapestry is one of the most "contact coloristic" genres of decorative art and its language is emotional on the basis of, above all, a coloristic solution, there is a need to identify and clarify the principles for constructing a decorative and coloristic composition of the tapestry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.372
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it