MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2923983287

Ірена Книш – громадський діяч, журналіст, публіцист, письменник(Irena Knysh – public activist, journalist, publicist, writer)

2017· article· uk· W2923983287 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Б. Л. Фуртак

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Repository of Ostroh Academy (Ostroh Academy) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageuk
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPolish-Jewish Holocaust Memory Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublishingPatriotismUkrainianSociologyMedia studiesPublic lifeArt historyArtPolitical scienceHistoryLawPhilosophyPolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Описано життєвий шлях і громадську та творчу діяльність канадської письменниці українського походження Ірени Книш. Зокрема, показані пріоритети її журналістської та публіцистичної діяльності. Коротко відтворено зміст та проаналізовано всі одинадцять книжок, які написала та видала своїм коштом Ірена Книш. Особливу увагу приділено книжкам «Патріотизм Анни Йонкер», «Іван Франко та рівноправність жінки», «Три ровесниці». (The life path and the social and creative activities of the Canadian writer of Ukrainian origin, Irena Knysh, are described. In particular, the priorities of her journalistic and publishing activities are shown. The content of all eleven books that Irena Knysh wrote and published at her own expense is briefly reproduced and analyzed. Particular attention is paid to the books «Anna Yonkers Patriotism», «Ivan Franko and the Equality of Women», «Three Ladies of the Same Age».)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.012
Scholarly communication0.0090.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Repository of Ostroh Academy (Ostroh Academy)Same topicPolish-Jewish Holocaust Memory StudiesFrench-language works237,207