MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2924011303 · doi:10.1142/s0217751x19500374

Quantum field theory in phase space

2019· article· en· W2924011303 on OpenAlexaff
R. G. G. Amorim, F. C. Khanna, A. P. C. Malbouisson, J. M. C. Malbouisson, A. E. Santana

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Modern Physics A · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Mechanics and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaTRIUMF
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsQuantum mechanicsPropagatorPhase spaceHilbert spaceQuantization (signal processing)Quantum field theoryFeynman diagramSecond quantizationOptical phase spaceMathematical physicsQuantumCoherent statesMathematicsSqueezed coherent stateCreation and annihilation operators

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The tilde conjugation rule in thermofield dynamics, equivalent to the modular conjugation in a [Formula: see text]-algebra, is used to develop unitary representations of the Poincaré group, where the Hilbert space has the phase space content, a symplectic Hilbert space. The state is described by a quasi-amplitude of probability, which is a sort of wave function in phase space, associated with the Wigner function. The quantum field theory in phase space is then constructed, including the quantization rules for the Klein–Gordon and the Dirac fields, the derivation of the electrodynamics in phase space and elements of a relativistic quantum kinetic theory. Towards a physical interpretation of the theory, propagators are associated with the corresponding Wigner functions. The Feynman rules follow accordingly with vertices similar to those of usual non-Abelian quantum field theories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.356
Threshold uncertainty score0.377

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Modern Physics ASame topicQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207