Bibliographic record
Abstract
Une parole féminine originale et innovatrice émerge des mises en récit de désirs féminins, de ces interdits transgressés par les protagonistes des romans Jane Eyre et Angéline de Montbrun (l’adultère chez Charlotte Brontë et le fantasme incestueux chez Laure Conan). Souvent symbolisé par les reflets des flammes des foyers sur les corps des héros, le regard des femmes s’est posé sur les patriarches. Compris dans le cadre d’une focalisation féminine, les hommes en position d’autorité sont objectivés, intégrés dans des représentations qui s’enchâssent dans une mise en abyme de l’acte d’écriture. Par l’étude des enjeux de la mise en récit des désirs féminins interdits, l’oeuvre de Conan est intégrée à une histoire littéraire des femmes plus vaste, plus ancienne et qui recoupe des domaines qui sont encore à penser, pour contrer l’effet discriminant des frontières géographiques et des identités nationales, et ainsi parvenir à mieux scruter la cohérence d’un imaginaire littéraire au féminin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".