Felt reports for the 1855 magnitude 5.2 Moncton, New Brunswick, earthquake
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The February 8th, 1855, magnitude 5.2 (mN) Moncton earthquake occurred sometime between 06:30am to 07:15am local time. It is one of the largest of southeastern New Brunswick and it caused minor damage. Chimney damage was reported in Moncton, New Brunswick. In Hopewell, near the epicentre, the shock cracked the plastering of walls. The earthquake was felt over most of New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island and was also felt in the state of Maine. This Open File Report provides the felt information from 55 localities. For each locality, the felt information is rated on the Modified Mercalli intensity (MMI) scale and tabulated in a Microsoft Excel sheet. When available, the description of the felt report is added. For many of the accounts, the second author copied the text by hand from the screen of the microfilm reader. In addition, when the copier microfilm reader was available, newspapers were scanned or copied from the on-line digital newspapers. The Open File also provides a GoogleEarth kmz file that allows the felt information reports to be viewed in a spatial tool.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".