MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2924232189 · doi:10.1051/epjconf/201921404008

Xcache in the ATLAS Distributed Computing Environment

2019· article· en· W2924232189 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEPJ Web of Conferences · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
FundersScience and Technology Facilities CouncilOffice of ScienceNational Energy Research Scientific Computing Center
KeywordsAtlas (anatomy)Computer sciencePlug-inOperating systemLarge Hadron ColliderPersonalizationDistributed computingArchitectureWorld Wide WebGeographyGeologyPhysicsParticle physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inherited from the flexible architecture of Xrootd, Xcache allows a wide range of customization through configurations and plugin modules. This paper describes several completed and ongoing R&D efforts of using Xcache in the LHC ATLAS distributed computing environment, in particular, using Xcache with the ATLAS data management system Rucio for easy-to-use and to improve cache hit rate, to replace Squid and improve distribution of large files in CVMFS, to adapt the HPC environment and the data lake model for efficient data distribution and access for the HPCs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.555
Threshold uncertainty score0.376

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it