MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2924516494 · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ab1213

Exploring light confinement in laser-processed LYSO:Ce for photon counting CT application

2019· article· en· W2924516494 on OpenAlexaff
Lisa Bläckberg, Salar Sajedi, Sophie Mandl, Arvind Mohan, Beca Vittum, Georges El Fakhri, Hamid Sabet

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics in Medicine and Biology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Institutes of HealthNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringUppsala Universitet
KeywordsLyso-PixelOpticsMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsCrystal (programming language)Silicon photomultiplierImage resolutionLaserPhysicsDetectorScintillatorComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the goal of developing a low-cost scintillator-based photon counting detector (PCD) with high dose efficiency suitable for CT, the light transport characteristics in LYSO:Ce detectors containing laser induced optical barriers (LIOB) are simulated. Light confinement and light collection efficiencies (LCE) are studied for a variety of optical barrier patterns and properties (refractive index (RI) and barrier/crystal interface roughness). Up to 80% confinement is achievable with a simple pixel pattern with one barrier wall separating each pixel coupled one-to-one to a photodetector (PD) pixel. Confinement is heavily dependent on barrier properties, and rough interfaces and higher RI results in increased cross-talk. Three approaches to enhance performance beyond the basic pattern are explored: (1) Multiple barrier walls separating each crystal pixel. (2) Introduction of long and short range confinement by having multiple crystal pixels per PD pixel. (3) Combination of LIOB and laser ablation (LA). (1) Is effective for rough interfaces where confinement can be increased by up to 24% for double compared to single walls. (2) Results in high confinement in the pixel centered on the PD pixel, but lower confinement closer to the PD edge. This feature may be explored to achieve spatial resolution beyond the PD pixel size using light sharing based positioning algorithms. (3) Can increase confinement for smooth interfaces using a smooth ablation in the bottom part of the crystal. A general trend across all configurations is a trade-off between light confinement and LCE. The LCE attainable is found comparable to that for mechanically pixelated arrays. While the confinement achievable with LIOB is always lower compared to a mechanically pixelated array, the former may offer a high level of flexibility in terms of detector design. This, in combination with the possibility to fabricate sub-mm pixels in a cost-effective manner, makes LIOB a promising technology for scintillator-based PCDs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.304
Threshold uncertainty score0.315

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics in Medicine and BiologySame topicAdvanced X-ray and CT ImagingFrench-language works237,207