MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2924542758 · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2019.2899345

The Influence of Thermal Properties and Canopy- Intercepted Snow on Passive Microwave Transmissivity of a Scots Pine

2019· article· en· W2924542758 on OpenAlexaff
Qinghuan Li, Richard Kelly, Leena Leppänen, Juho Vehviläinen, Anna Kontu, Juha Lemmetyinen, Jouni Pulliainen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceTree canopySnowCanopyAtmospheric sciencesRadiometerScots pineEmissivityMicrowaveRemote sensingMeteorologyPinus <genus>GeologyEcologyOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While many microwave studies related to tree emission have been undertaken, a few have considered the effect of phenological change on the emission from coniferous trees. The permittivity of vegetation tissue is known to be influenced by water content, while the water content and phase is sensitive to temperature in particular at temperatures below freezing. In addition to temperature, canopy-intercepted snow might also modify the tree emission and transmissivity in the microwave range. In this paper, a season-long experiment was designed to quantify the effect of snow accumulation and temperature on the observed microwave transmissivity from tree. A ground-based, upward-pointing multifrequency radiometer was used to monitor the microwave emissivity of a single coniferous tree at a site in Northern Finland. Radiometer measurements were combined with measurements of the canopy-intercepted snow cover and tree skin temperature. This paper presents two important findings. First, the tree transmissivity was strongly correlated with tree skin temperature under subzero temperature conditions, but uncorrelated with skin temperature changes above freezing. Second, although the tree transmissivity was slightly affected by the snow accumulation on the tree canopy, the overall influence on tree emission was statistically insignificant in this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.504
Threshold uncertainty score0.422

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote SensingSame topicSoil Moisture and Remote SensingFrench-language works237,207