Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of 3 Different Management Protocols in Pediatric Diabetic Ketoacidosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Management protocols for pediatric diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) vary considerably among medical centers. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of 3 different fluid protocols in the management of DKA. METHODS: Fluid management protocols with sodium contents of 75, 100, and 154 mEq/L NaCl were compared. In all groups, after the initial rehydration, the protocols differed from each other in terms of the maintenance fluid, which had different rates of infusion and sodium contents. Clinical status and blood glucose levels were checked every hour during the first 12 hours. Biochemical tests were repeated at 2, 6, 12, 24, and 36 hours. RESULTS: The medical records of 144 patients were evaluated. Cerebral edema developed in 18% of the patients. The incidence of cerebral edema was lowest in the group that received fluid therapy with a sodium content of 154 mEq/L NaCl at least 4 to 6 hours and had a constant rate of infusion for 48 hours. The patients with cerebral edema had lower initial pH and HCO3 and severe dehydration with higher initial plasma osmolality. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of the recovery times of blood glucose, pH, HCO3, and the time of transition to subcutaneous insulin therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Severity of acidosis and dehydration are associated with the development of cerebral edema. It can be concluded that fluid therapy with higher Na content and a constant maintenance rate may present less risk for the patient with DKA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".