MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2924624718 · doi:10.1088/1361-6528/ab1375

Modeling selective-area growth of InAsSb nanowires

2019· article· en· W2924624718 on OpenAlexafffund
А. С. Соколовский, Mitchell Robson, Ray LaPierre, В. Г. Дубровский

Bibliographic record

VenueNanotechnology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanowire Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaRussian Science FoundationRussian Foundation for Basic Research
KeywordsMaterials scienceNanowireOptoelectronicsGrowth modelNanotechnologyEngineering physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract An analytical growth model is presented to explain the influence of antimony fractional flux on the morphology evolution of catalyst-free InAs 1− x Sb x semiconductor nanowires grown by the selective-area vapor–solid mechanism on a Si (111) substrate by molecular beam epitaxy. Increasing Sb fractional flux promoted radial growth and suppressed axial growth, resulting in ‘nano-disks’. This behavior is explained by a model of indium adatom diffusion along nanowire facets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.180
Threshold uncertainty score0.442

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNanotechnologySame topicNanowire Synthesis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207