MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2924679515 · doi:10.1186/s13063-019-3233-7

The cerebral mechanism of acupuncture for treating knee osteoarthritis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

2019· article· en· W2924679515 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jing Guo, Zhengjie Li, Shirui Cheng, Chenjian Tang, Xiaohui Dong, Wenhua He, Yong Huang, Bao Yin, Yu Sheng, Jun Zhou, Aijia Li, Fang Zeng, Lei Lan, Fanrong Liang

Bibliographic record

VenueTrials · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcupuncture Treatment Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPostdoctoral Research Foundation of ChinaChengdu UniversityChengdu University of Traditional Chinese MedicineNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaDepartment of Science and Technology of Sichuan ProvinceChina Postdoctoral Science Foundation
KeywordsMedicineAcupuncturePhysical therapyRandomized controlled trialVisual analogue scaleOsteoarthritisRating scaleClinical trialPhysical medicine and rehabilitationRepeated measures designAnxietyQuality of life (healthcare)Alternative medicineSurgeryPsychiatryInternal medicinePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Acupuncture is safe and effective for reducing the symptoms of knee osteoarthritis (KOA), but the underlying mechanisms of acupuncture for treating KOA are not fully understood. METHODS/DESIGN: In total, 108 participants diagnosed with KOA will be recruited. They will be blinded to group assignment and randomized to either verum acupuncture, sham acupuncture or waiting-list groups with 36 patients in each group. Each patient in the acupuncture group will receive five treatments per week for 2 weeks. This study will focus on detecting the cerebral functional connectivity changes elicited by acupuncture treatment. The Visual Analog Scale and the short form of the McGill Pain Questionnaire, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, the Attention Test Scale, the Pain Assessment of Sphygmomanometer and the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey will be used to evaluate the symptoms and quality of life improvement at the baseline and the end of treatment. The Self-rating Anxiety Scale and the Self-rating Depression Scale will be used at the baseline and the end of treatment to investigate the influence of emotional state on brain activity and clinical variable. To ensure the consistency of acupuncture manipulation, the deqi scale will be performed after each acupuncture treatment. During the procedure of outcome evaluation and data analysis, the evaluators and statisticians will be blinded to the group allocation. The repeated measures analysis of variance (3 groups × 2 time points ANOVA) will be employed to analyze numerical variables of the clinical and neuroimaging data generated in the study, then the t test will be used in the post-hoc analysis. DISCUSSION: The results of this randomized, sham- and waiting-list-controlled functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study will help to investigate the influence of verum acupuncture treatment on the brain activities of patients with KOA, which might provide evidence for the clinical application of verum acupuncture for KOA management. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ID: ChiCT-IOR-17012364 . Registered on 14 August 2017.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.979

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.433
Teacher spread0.366 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTrialsSame topicAcupuncture Treatment Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207