Population productivity of wedgefishes, guitarfishes, and banjo rays: inferring the potential for recovery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Recent evidence of widespread and rapid declines of wedgefishes, guitarfishes, and banjo ray populations (Order Rhinopristiformes), driven by a high demand for their fins in Asian markets and the quality of their flesh, raises concern about their risk of over-exploitation and extinction. Using life history theory and incorporating uncertainty into a modified Euler-Lotka model, maximum intrinsic rates of population increase ( r max ) were estimated for nine species from the four families of rhinopristiforms. Estimates of median r max varied from −0.04 to 0.60 year −1 among the nine species, but generally increased with increasing maximum size. In comparison to 115 other species of chondrichthyans for which r max values were available, the families Rhinidae and Glaucostegidae are relatively productive, while most species from Rhinobatidae and Trygonorrhinidae had relatively low r max values. If the demand for their high value products can be addressed, then population recovery for this species is likely possible but will vary depending on the species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".