MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2925130039 · doi:10.5530/ijmedph.2019.1.1

Food for Thought: The Role of Undernutrition and Diabetes in India’s TB Epidemic

2019· article· en· W2925130039 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pranay Sinha, Natasha S. Hochberg

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Medicine and Public Health · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicChild Nutrition and Water Access
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOffice of International Science and EngineeringIndian Council of Medical ResearchWarren Alpert FoundationSchool of Medicine, Boston UniversityNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesCRDF GlobalDepartment of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaNational Institutes of HealthNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMedicineMalnutritionPublic healthGovernment (linguistics)Economic growthQuarter (Canadian coin)Environmental healthGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite shouldering more than a quarter of the global TB burden, the Indian government has promised its citizens a "TB-Mukt Bharat" (TB-free India) by 2025, ten years ahead of the global target. 1 To accomplish this feat, the government dramatically increased TB funding over the past few years.Indeed, the Indian TB budget in 2016 was 280 million dollars with 62% of the funding coming from international sources. 1 In 2018, India spent 580 million dollars on TB programs with 79% coming from domestic sources-a marked increase.2 As the TB budget grows in girth, we must ensure that funding is directed toward addressing challenges particular to the India: pervasive undernutrition and the meteoric rise of diabetes which are driving the TB epidemic in India.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0040.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Medicine and Public HealthSame topicChild Nutrition and Water AccessFrench-language works237,207