MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2925265835 · doi:10.1093/gji/ggz156

Inversion using spatially variable mixed ℓp norms

2019· article· en· W2925265835 on OpenAlexaffabout
Dominique Fournier, Douglas W. Oldenburg

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Journal International · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInverse theoryGeologyInversion (geology)Variable (mathematics)GeodesySeismologyGeophysicsMathematicsMathematical analysisTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Non-uniqueness in the geophysical inverse problem is well recognized and so too is the ability to obtain solutions with different character by altering the form of the regularization function. Of particular note is the use of ℓp norms with p ∈ [0, 2] which gives rise to sparse or smooth models. Most algorithms are designed to implement a single ℓp norm for the entire model domain. This is not adequate when the fundamental character of the model changes throughout the volume of interest. In such cases we require a generalized regularization function where each sub-volume of the model domain has penalties on smallness and roughness and its own suite of ℓp parameters. Solving the inverse problem using mixed ℓp norms in the regularization (especially for p < 1) is computationally challenging. We use the Lawson formulation for the ℓp norm and solve the optimization problem with Iterative Reweighted Least Squares. The algorithm has two stages; we first solve the l2-norm problem and then we switch to the desired suite of ℓp norms; there is one value of p for each term in the objective function. To handle the large changes in numerical values of the regularization function when p values are changed, and to ensure that each component of the regularization is contributing to the final solution, we successively rescale the gradients in our Gauss–Newton solution. An indicator function allows us to evaluate our success in finding a solution in which components of the objective function have been equally influential. We use our algorithm to generate an ensemble of solutions with mixed ℓp norms. This illuminates some of the non-uniqueness in the inverse problem and helps prevent overinterpretation that can occur by having only one solution. In addition, we use this ensemble to estimate the suite of p values that can be used in a final inversion. First, the most common features of our ensemble are extracted using principal component analysis and edge detection procedures; this provides a reference model. A correlation of each member of the ensemble with the reference model, carried out in a windowed domain, then yields a set of p values for each model cell. The efficacy of our technique is illustrated on a synthetic 2-D cross-well example. We then apply our technique to the field example that motivated this research, the 3-D inversion of magnetic data at a kimberlite site in Canada. Since the final regularization terms have different sets of p values in different regions of model space we are able to recover compact regions associated with the kimberlite intrusions, continuous linear features with sharp edges that are associated with dykes and a background that is relatively smooth. The result has a geologic character that would not have been achievable without the use of spatially variable mixed norms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations103
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Journal InternationalSame topicSparse and Compressive Sensing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207