MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2925265835 · doi:10.1093/gji/ggz156

Inversion using spatially variable mixed ℓp norms

2019· article· en· W2925265835 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Journal International · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInverse theoryGeologyInversion (geology)Variable (mathematics)GeodesySeismologyGeophysicsMathematicsMathematical analysisTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Non-uniqueness in the geophysical inverse problem is well recognized and so too is the ability to obtain solutions with different character by altering the form of the regularization function. Of particular note is the use of ℓp norms with p ∈ [0, 2] which gives rise to sparse or smooth models. Most algorithms are designed to implement a single ℓp norm for the entire model domain. This is not adequate when the fundamental character of the model changes throughout the volume of interest. In such cases we require a generalized regularization function where each sub-volume of the model domain has penalties on smallness and roughness and its own suite of ℓp parameters. Solving the inverse problem using mixed ℓp norms in the regularization (especially for p < 1) is computationally challenging. We use the Lawson formulation for the ℓp norm and solve the optimization problem with Iterative Reweighted Least Squares. The algorithm has two stages; we first solve the l2-norm problem and then we switch to the desired suite of ℓp norms; there is one value of p for each term in the objective function. To handle the large changes in numerical values of the regularization function when p values are changed, and to ensure that each component of the regularization is contributing to the final solution, we successively rescale the gradients in our Gauss–Newton solution. An indicator function allows us to evaluate our success in finding a solution in which components of the objective function have been equally influential. We use our algorithm to generate an ensemble of solutions with mixed ℓp norms. This illuminates some of the non-uniqueness in the inverse problem and helps prevent overinterpretation that can occur by having only one solution. In addition, we use this ensemble to estimate the suite of p values that can be used in a final inversion. First, the most common features of our ensemble are extracted using principal component analysis and edge detection procedures; this provides a reference model. A correlation of each member of the ensemble with the reference model, carried out in a windowed domain, then yields a set of p values for each model cell. The efficacy of our technique is illustrated on a synthetic 2-D cross-well example. We then apply our technique to the field example that motivated this research, the 3-D inversion of magnetic data at a kimberlite site in Canada. Since the final regularization terms have different sets of p values in different regions of model space we are able to recover compact regions associated with the kimberlite intrusions, continuous linear features with sharp edges that are associated with dykes and a background that is relatively smooth. The result has a geologic character that would not have been achievable without the use of spatially variable mixed norms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.743
Threshold uncertainty score0.406

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it