MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2925365986 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.00740

Projectron -- A Shallow and Interpretable Network for Classifying Medical Images

2019· preprint· en· W2925365986 on OpenAlexaff
Aditya Sriram, Shivam Kalra, Hamid R. Tizhoosh

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAI in cancer detection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadonMNIST databaseComputer scienceEquidistantEncoding (memory)Artificial intelligenceRadon transformPattern recognition (psychology)Layer (electronics)Image (mathematics)Artificial neural networkDomain (mathematical analysis)Computer visionMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces the `Projectron' as a new neural network architecture that uses Radon projections to both classify and represent medical images. The motivation is to build shallow networks which are more interpretable in the medical imaging domain. Radon transform is an established technique that can reconstruct images from parallel projections. The Projectron first applies global Radon transform to each image using equidistant angles and then feeds these transformations for encoding to a single layer of neurons followed by a layer of suitable kernels to facilitate a linear separation of projections. Finally, the Projectron provides the output of the encoding as an input to two more layers for final classification. We validate the Projectron on five publicly available datasets, a general dataset (namely MNIST) and four medical datasets (namely Emphysema, IDC, IRMA, and Pneumonia). The results are encouraging as we compared the Projectron's performance against MLPs with raw images and Radon projections as inputs, respectively. Experiments clearly demonstrate the potential of the proposed Projectron for representing/classifying medical images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.148 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicAI in cancer detectionFrench-language works237,207