Acting out what is inside of us: Self-management strategies of an abused ex-athlete
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, the authors make use of narrative inquiry from the position of a story teller byusing creative nonfiction to bring forward the complexities of abuse in sport. Through theuse of vignettes, one female athlete’s story of how she self-managed her abuse post sport byacting out sexually is made known. As taboo stories tend to be silenced in sport literature,this research foregrounds how one athlete took back the power and control with men as away of self-managing the physical and emotional abuse she experienced from malecoaches. Although a temporary fix, the vignettes highlight how this athlete’s selfmanagement strategies were a complex form of empowerment, a contrast to what she feltwhen she was the recipient of abuse. The reader is encouraged to construct their ownunderstanding of the athlete’s stories, thinking with her story rather than about her story.This paper contributes to understandings of athlete abuse by providing insight into the lackof support an athlete received post sport and further how she was expected to fend forherself, formulating her own self-management/coping strategies. Sport managersdeveloping interventions and strategies related to abused athletes should consider thediverse challenges that they face.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it