MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W292560316

A foodborne pathogen: Arcobacter.

2009· article· de· W292560316 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Reyhan İrkin, Mihriban Korukluoğlu

Bibliographic record

VenueGIDA - Journal of Food · 2009
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArcobacterCampylobacterBiologyOutbreakMicrobiologyBacteriaRaw meatRaw milkFood scienceVirology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arcobacter, which are Gram-negative, zoonotic and aero-tolerant bacteria belonging to the family Campylobacteraceae, differentiate from Campylobacter, as it is able to grow at 15 oC and optimally at 30 oC in aerobic conditions, but not at 42 oC and it contains 27-30% moles of G+C but not menaquinone-6 which is one of the major isoprenoid quinones. Arcobacter have some species like A. butzleri, A. cryaerophilus, A. skirrowii, A. cibarius, A. sulfidicus. It is known that Arcobacter recently caused food poisoning outbreaks in some countries like Italy, Canada and Brazil. It is reported that Arcobacter causes infections in humans through contaminated water, poultry, meat carcasses, meat products and raw milk. Researches on pathways of spread to humans and toxin mechanisms are very limited and insufficient. It is known that these bacteria are resistant to some of the antibiotics to some extent. In this review, potential pathogenity of Arcobacter spp. in animals and humans, pathways of spread, problems caused by these bacteria and possible control measures were discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGIDA - Journal of Food→Same topicSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology→French-language works237,207→