MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2925728504 · doi:10.2118/193836-ms

Simulation of Radio Frequency Heating of Heavy Oil Reservoir Using Multi-Physics Coupling of Reservoir Simulation with Electromagnetic Solver

2019· article· en· W2925728504 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Reservoir Simulation Conference · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoupling (piping)SolverReservoir simulationPetroleum engineeringRadio frequencySteam-assisted gravity drainageSimulationComputer scienceEngineeringMechanical engineeringMaterials scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) is one of the popular methods for heavy oil production. The process is efficient and economical. However, it requires the use of large quantity of water and disposal of waste water can be costly. In addition, burning of natural gas for steam generation contributes to additional carbon dioxide generation, a known greenhouse gas, which is also undesirable. A method to heat up the in-situ oil without the use of injected water is highly desirable. Radio frequency (RF) heating of heavy oil reservoir is a potential method for oil recovery without steam injection. The evaluation of the potential of such method requires the coupling of a reservoir simulator with an electromagnetic (EM) simulator. This paper describes the development and implementation of a flexible interface in a reservoir simulator that allows the runtime loading of third party software libraries with additional physics. Data is exchanged between the reservoir simulator and externally loaded software libraries through memory, therefore there is minimal communication overhead. The implementation allows for iterative coupling, explicit coupling and periodic coupling. This paper describes the mathematical coupling of the mass and energy conservation equations in the reservoir simulator with the Maxwell equations in an external library. The electromagnetic properties in the reservoir are highly dependent on temperature and water saturation, this dependence is accounted for in the coupled code using table look-up properties. Canadian heavy oil and reservoir properties were used in our simulation investigation. We found that RF heating alone can be effective in heating up the in-situ water and reducing heavy oil viscosity by several orders of magnitude. As the in-situ water near wellbore was vaporized by RF heating, electrical conductivities were reduced to zero and thus allowed the EM wave to propagate further into the formation and heat up the water further away from the wellbore. With properly designed RF heating field pilots and tuning of EM and reservoir parameters, the coupled reservoir/EM simulator can be a powerful tool for the evaluation and optimization of RF heating operations. The interface is sufficiently flexible to allow different types of multi-physics coupling. In addition to RF heating, it has also been used for reaction kinetics and geomechanics coupling with a reservoir simulator. It has been used for large scale coupled full field simulation with over 30 million cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it