MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2925916936 · doi:10.11159/icsect19.105

Analysis of Rectangular Plates Based on the Hydrostatic Point Phenomenon

2019· article· en· W2925916936 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mohammad Alhassan, Rajai Z. Al‐Rousan, Moheldeen A. Hejazi

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCivil and Structural Engineering Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJordan University of Science and Technology
KeywordsPoint (geometry)PhenomenonHydrostatic equilibriumComputer scienceMathematicsPhysicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper provides innovative analysis of rectangular plates having various aspect ratios and boundary conditions based on a true understanding of the two-way action.Nine plates with different boundary conditions, each having 11 aspect ratios were uniquely analysed using SAP2000 software.The finite element analysis results were validated against mathematical solutions showed a satisfactory agreement.The hydrostatic point phenomenon was established as the reference point for identifying plates with actual twoway action and as the growth reference for other cases, allowing for the use growth models for both the hydrostatic and deviatoric moment tensors.The innovative selection of the extreme positive point moment facilitates the introduction of material nonlinearity into the design.The plate shorter dimension was used for moment normalization in both directions to preserve the directional influence of the dimensions and to isolate the hydrostatic phenomenon.It was found that for any boundary conditions, through starting at a hydrostatic phenomenon occurrence and via fixing a dimension and extending the perpendicular dimension, the extreme point Mohr circle develops from the hydrostatic point phenomenon as a growth in the hydrostatic component and a more radical growth in the deviatoric component.The largest principal moment develops a higher magnitude as the aspect ratio increases.The presence of non-identical boundary conditions in the plate on two perpendicular directions results in a deviation of the two-way action.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental EngineeringSame topicCivil and Structural Engineering ResearchFrench-language works237,207