MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2926012172 · doi:10.5539/apr.v11n2p92

Formation of Particle Real Energy in the Bicubic Equation Limiting Particle Velocity Formalism with Possible Applications to Light Dark Matter

2019· article· en· W2926012172 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Josip Šoln

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsFormalism (music)LimitingBicubic interpolationMathematical physicsParticle systemQuantum mechanicsMathematical analysisMathematicsLinear interpolation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The complex particle energy, appearing in this article, with the suggestive choices of physical parameters,is transformed simply into the real particle energy. Then with the bicubic equation limiting particle velocity formalism, one evaluates the three particle limiting velocities, $c_{1},$ $c_{2}$\ and $% c_{3},$ (primary, obscure and normal) in terms of the ordinary particle velocity, $v$, and derived positive $m_{+}=m\succ 0$ \ and negative \ $% m_{-}=-m\prec 0$ \ \ particle masses with $m_{+}^{2}=m_{-}^{2}=$ $m^{2}$. In general, the important quantity in solving this bicubic equation is the real square value $\ z^{2}(m)$ of the congruent parameter, $z(m)$, that connects real or complex value of particle energy, $E,$ and the real or complex value of particle velocity squared, $v^{2}$, $2Ez(m)=3\sqrt{3}mv^{2}$% . With real $z^{2}(m)$ one determines the real value of discriminant, $D,$ of the bicubic equation, and they together influence the connection between $% E$ and $v^{2}.$ Hence, when $z^{2}\prec 1$ and \ $D\prec 0$ one has simply that $E\gg mv^{2}$. However,with $D\succeq 0$ and $z^{2}\succeq 1$ , both $E$ and $v^{2}$ may become complex simultaneously through connecting relation $% E=3\sqrt{3}mv^{2}/2z(m)$, with their real values satisfying \ Re $E\succcurlyeq m\left( \func{Re}v^{2}\right) $, keeping, however $z^{2}$ the same and real. In this article, this new situation with $D\succeq 0$ is discussed in detail.by looking as how to adjust the particle\ parameters to have $\func{Im% }E=0$ with implication that automatically also Im$v^{2}=0.$.In fact, after having adjusted the particle\ parameters successfully this way, one simply writes Re$E=E$ and Re$v^{2}=v^{2}$. \ \ This way one arrives at that the limiting velocities satisfy $c_{1}=c_{2}$\ $\#$ $c_{3}$, which shows the degeneracy of $c_{1}$ and $c_{2}$ as the same numerical limiting velocity for two particles. This degeneracy $c_{1}$ =$c_{2}$ is simply due to the absence of $\func{Im}E$. It would start disappearing with just an infinitesimal $\func{Im}E$. Now,while $c_{1}=c_{2}$ is real, $c_{3}$ is imaginary and all of them associated with the same particle energy, $E$. With these velocity values the congruent parameter becomes quantized as $% z(m_{\pm })=3\sqrt{3}m_{\pm }v^{2}/2E=\pm 1$ which, with the bicubic discriminant $D=0$ value, implies the quantization also of the particle mass, $m,$ into $m_{\pm }=\pm m$ values . The numerically equal energies,from $E=\func{Re}E$ can be expressed as $\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ $$E(c_{1,2}($ $m_{\pm }))=E(c_{3}(m_{\pm }))$ either directly in terms of $% c_{1}(m_{\pm })=c_{2}(m_{\pm })$ and $c_{3}(m_{\pm })$ or also indirectly in terms of particle velocity, $v$, as well as in the Lorentzian fixed forms with $v^{2}\#$ $c_{1}^{2},$ $c_{2}^{2}$\ or $c_{3}^{2}$ assuring different from zero mass, $m$ $\#$ $0$. At the end, with here developed formalism, one calculates for a light sterile neutrino dark matter particle, the energies associated with $m_{\pm} $ masses and $c_{1,2}$and $c_{3}$ limiting velocities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics ResearchSame topicAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical MechanicsFrench-language works237,207