MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2926057697

Learning about the Lifeworlds of Trans, Non-Binary and Gender Non-conforming Children through an interactive video game

2018· article· en· W2926057697 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sharalyn Jordan

Bibliographic record

Venue2019 Conference of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDigital Games and Media
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransgenderVideo gameVulnerability (computing)PsychologyResource (disambiguation)Mathematics educationComputer scienceMultimedia
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This workshop will explore the value of video game technology in educational settings for supporting and including transgender students. The Gender Vectors project is comprised of a team of researchers from Simon Fraser University, working with transgender, non binary, and gender nonconforming (T/NB/GNC) children and youth in the Lower Mainland (B.C.) to produce a video game as an educational tool. Since 2015 our team has been working to build a prototype of an interactive gaming resource that makes visible the experiences of precarity and vulnerability, as well as resilience, of T/NB/GNC children and youth. The game will also function as database for available resources for T/NB/GNC children and youth in the Greater Vancouver Area, and simultaneously make visible what resources and forms of support- social, educational, medical, and cultural- are still lacking. Through our workshop, we will invite attendees to test the prototype of our game, and engage in a discussion of how to create inclusive educational environments for T/NB/GNC children and youth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2019 Conference of the Canadian Society for the Study of EducationSame topicDigital Games and MediaFrench-language works237,207