MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2926304387 · doi:10.1353/esc.2002.0063

“Acts of self-exposure”: Closeted ‘Desire in Margeret Atwood’s Cat’s Eye

2002· article· en· W2926304387 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Laura M. Robinson

Bibliographic record

VenueEnglish studies in Canada · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicUtopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLesbianPsychoanalysisGender studiesArtHeterosexualityTransgenderRepresentation (politics)SociologyAestheticsPsychologyHomosexualityLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Examining Margaret Atwood’s Cat’s Eye (1988) with Judith Butler’s gender theory reveals the unarticulated lesbian desire of the narrator. While this closeted desire may be perceived as maintaining cumpulsory heterosexuality by, once again, silencing the lesbian voice, it arguably suggests the opposite; the patriarchal, heterosexual order is continually undermined by the silent presence of another voice. The closeted desire in Cat’s Eye refuses to be (and cannot be) fixed within the patriarchal, heterosexual economy of traditional art and rebounds, unarticulated, as a liberatory gesture signifying that the individual cannot be trapped, once and for all, in a single representation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.917
Threshold uncertainty score0.738

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnglish studies in CanadaSame topicUtopian, Dystopian, and Speculative FictionFrench-language works237,207