MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

CONTINUOUS EDUCATION OF CANADA IN SCIENTIFIC AND PEDAGOGICAL LITERATURE

2019· article· en· W2926531856 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Olena Barabash

Bibliographic record

VenueМолодий вчений · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Critical Thinking Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematics educationEngineering ethicsSociologyPedagogyPolitical sciencePsychologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Національний університет «Львівська політехніка» НЕПЕРЕРВНА ОСВІТА КАНАДИ У НАУКОВО-ПЕДАГОГІЧНІЙ ЛІТЕРАТУРІ Анотація.У статті розглянуті проблеми неперервної освіти у науково-педагогічній літературі.Проведений аналіз науково-педагогічної літератури вітчизняних та зарубіжних науковців.Досліджено специфіку організації неперервної освіти у Канаді.Освіта впродовж усього життя досліджується як система взаємопов'язаних компонентів.А ще аналізується роль та значення неперервної освіти у сучасному суспільстві на прикладі Канади.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score0.838

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0150.037
Science and technology studies0.0160.009
Scholarly communication0.0180.006
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueМолодий вченийSame topicEducation and Critical Thinking DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207