MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2926830243 · doi:10.1161/hcq.12.suppl_1.121

Abstract 121: An Investigation of Plant-based, Mediterranean, Paleolithic, and Dash Diets Study (the VA Beach Diet Study)

2019· article· en· W2926830243 on OpenAlexaff
Joshua Edwards, Deepak Talreja, Holly Buchanan, Roshan Talreja, Brant Thomas, Hyeon Choi, Jesse S Clair, Sarah E. Joyner, Sunita Dodani

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutritional Studies and Diet
Canadian institutionsSt. Clair College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDashMedicineMediterranean dietIncidence (geometry)Prospective cohort studyCholesterolDiseaseAnimal scienceInternal medicineEnvironmental healthBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Study Objectives: The rising incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) over the last 25 years has become a public health priority, especially its prevention through lifestyle interventions. Many studies have reported that higher adherence to Mediterranean, vegan or whole-food, plant based (WFPB) diets may decrease CVD incidence and mortality. However evidence on the health effects of various diets on CVD health is equivocal. The objective of this study is to compare and assess the relative impact of four different types of diets; i.e. a) WFPB; b) Mediterranean; c) Paleolithic; and d) Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diets on CVD health. Methods: This is a 6-month prospective clinical trial examining 280 participants stratified into four nonrandomized groups over a two month intervention with a follow up at six months of encouraged diet compliance. Clinical and behavioral measures related to CVD were collected; including, HDL, LDL, Total Cholesterol and Triglycerides. 60-day difference in CVD factors were analyzed using Repeated Measures ANOVA between all diets and two-tailed t-test to compare the WFPB diet vs. all other diets. Results: Significant 60-day differences between all diets were seen for HDL (p<0.0001), LDL (p<0.0002), Triglycerides (p<0.0001) and total cholesterol (p<0.0001). Between group analysis further revealed that participants on the WFPB diet had greater significant differences in LDL (14% decrease), triglycerides (18% decrease) and total cholesterol (13% decrease) compared to all other diets. Conversely, after 60 days, the Mediterranean diet (5% increase) followed by the DASH diet (3% increase) had significant greater increases in HDL when compared to the WFPB diet (10% decrease). After 6 months, significant decreases in HDL remained in the WFPB diet (20% decrease) compared to DASH and Paleo diets (both 8% decrease). Conclusion: Participants in the WFPB diet group demonstrated significant improvements in modifiable CVD risk factors compared to other diet categories over 60 days. Future research exploring the impact of quality of WFPB diets on long-term health outcomes is necessary

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.581

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation Cardiovascular Quality and OutcomesSame topicNutritional Studies and DietFrench-language works237,207