β-Adrenoreceptors do not oppose sympathetic vasoconstriction in resting and contracting skeletal muscle of male rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sympathetic nervous system (SNS) vasoconstriction is primarily achieved through the binding of norepinephrine (NE) to α-adrenoreceptors. However, NE may also bind to β-adrenoreceptors and cause vasodilation that may oppose/blunt SNS-mediated vasoconstriction. Therefore, this study investigated the hypothesis that β-adrenoreceptor–mediated vasodilation opposes evoked vasoconstriction in resting and contracting skeletal muscle. Male (n = 9) Sprague–Dawley rats were anesthetized and surgically instrumented for stimulation of the lumbar sympathetic chain and measurement of arterial blood pressure and femoral artery blood flow. The percentage change of femoral vascular conductance in response to sympathetic chain stimulation delivered at 2 and 5 Hz was determined at rest and during triceps surae skeletal muscle contraction before (control) and after β-adrenoreceptor blockade (propranolol; 0.075 mg·kg−1, intravenously). β-Adrenoreceptor blockade did not alter (P > 0.05) baseline hemodynamics or the hyperemic response to exercise. At the 2 Hz stimulation frequency, sympathetic vasoconstriction was similar (P > 0.05) in control and β-blockade conditions in resting (control, −34% ± 6%; β-blockade, −33% ± 8%) and contracting (control, −16% ± 6%; β-blockade, −14% ± 7%) muscle. At the 5 Hz stimulation frequency, sympathetic vasoconstrictor responsiveness was reduced (main effect of drug, P < 0.05) following β-blockade (rest: control, −52% ± 7%; β-blockade, −51% ± 9%; contraction: control, −32% ± 11%; β-blockade, −29% ± 13%). Novelty These data indicate that β-adrenoreceptor blockade did not augment sympathetic vasoconstriction at rest or during exercise. The study demonstrates that β-adrenoreceptors do not oppose evoked sympathetic vasoconstriction in resting or contracting skeletal muscle or contribute to functional sympatholysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".