MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Novel Approach to Examining Multiple Indoor Exposures in Early Childhood on the Inflammatory Pathway and Risk of Intermediate Outcomes for Childhood Asthma in the Canadian Healthy Infant Longitudinal Development (CHILD) Birth Cohort

2018· article· en· W2927152106 on OpenAlexaffabout
Tim K. Takaro, Martine Vrijheid, Xavier Basagaña, Jaclyn Parks, Allan B. Becker, James A. Scott, Diana L. Lefebvre, Wendy Lou, Piush J. Mandhane, Padmaja Subbarao, Stuart E. Turvey, Malcolm R. Sears, Jeffrey R. Brook

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicNoise Effects and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaMcMaster UniversityUniversity of TorontoSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWheezeAtopyAsthmaMedicineOdds ratioAllergyRespiratory soundsPediatricsCohortCohort studyInterquartile rangeEnvironmental healthImmunologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rationale: Oxidizing chemicals found in the indoor environment, particularly consumer products, can cause inflammation leading to respiratory illness. The CHILD birth cohort is a national study examining how environmental exposures interact with genetics, immune system, microbiome and other personal characteristics to impact the risk of developing asthma and allergies.Methods: 2700 of 3,455 children born into the CHILD cohort were included in this analysis. A comprehensive suite of indoor exposures with potential inflammatory properties (e.g. mold and moisture, cleaning products and other household chemicals, and pests) in infancy were combined into an Indoor Environmental Exposure Index (IEEI). Exposures were evaluated against asthma-related outcomes of recurrent wheeze, atopy and diagnosed asthma at age 3 years.Results: In logistic regression (adjusted for sex, parental atopy, income, ethnicity, and tobacco exposure) the IEEI at age 3 months was associated with a significantly higher risk of asthma and wheeze + atopy at 3 years of age in both continuous and interquartile comparisons, but not with atopy alone.IEEI as Continuous Variable ........IEEI Comparing Upper to Lower QuartileOutcome; Odds Ratio (95 % C.I.); Odds Ratio (95 % C.I.)Asthma 1.39* (1.03 – 1.86) ............1.98* (1.02-4.12)Atopy ...1.12 (0.94 - 1.33) ...1.37 (0.91-2.07)Wheeze+Atopy 1.56* (1.03 - 2.38) 3.53* (1.23-12.7) *p-value < 0.05Conclusions: Infants with wheeze, and wheeze with atopy are at higher risk for developing asthma later in life. Our findings indicate that ubiquitous indoor exposures in the first 3 months of life may contribute to higher risk of wheeze and atopy, which may ultimately lead to asthma later in life. Given the longitudinal nature of CHILD, we can add exposure periods at later ages and track these relationships with more definitive asthma development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score0.271

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISEE Conference AbstractsSame topicNoise Effects and ManagementFrench-language works237,207