A generalization of partial least squares regression and correspondence analysis for categorical and mixed data: An application with the ADNI data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Current large scale studies of brain and behavior typically involve multiple populations, diverse types of data (e.g., genetics, brain structure, behavior, demographics, or “mutli-omics,” and “deep-phenotyping”) measured on various scales of measurement. To analyze these heterogeneous data sets we need simple but flexible methods able to integrate the inherent properties of these complex data sets. Here we introduce partial least squares-correspondence analysis-regression (PLS-CA-R) a method designed to address these constraints. PLS-CA-R generalizes PLS regression to most data types (e.g., continuous, ordinal, categorical, non-negative values). We also show that PLS-CA-R generalizes many “two-table” multivariate techniques and their respective algorithms, such as various PLS approaches, canonical correlation analysis, and redundancy analysis (a.k.a. reduced rank regression).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it