Retrieval of Oil–Water Mixture Ratio at Ocean Surface Using Compact Polarimetry Synthetic Aperture Radar
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The oil–water mixture ratio for oil spills on the ocean surface is an important parameter for volume estimation of oil spills, response strategy for the oil spills, cleanup operations, and remediation planning for the impacts on wildlife. Hybrid-polarized (HP) mode compact polarization (CP) synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery will soon be available with the launch of the RADARSAT Constellation Mission. The advantage of the proposed new SAR system is that CP images will have wider swath and shorter revisit time compared to quad-polarization (QP) images, which are presently available from space-borne and air-borne SAR. We present a methodology to retrieve the oil–water mixture ratio at the ocean surface using CP SAR imagery. We emulated the HP mode of CP SAR image using Uninhabited Aerial Vehicle SAR (UAVSAR) L band observations collected on 23 June 2010 over the site of the Deep Water Horizon drilling rig. The gap between elements ratio of CP SAR covariance matrix and that of QP SAR Sinclair matrix is bridged. Numerical optimization and look up table methods are used to relate the oil–water mixture ratio to elements of the covariance matrix for the HP data backscatter. The mixture ratio estimates determined from the ratio of diagonal elements of the covariance matrix for HP mode CP data are compared with results retrieved from the co-polarization ratio from the original QP SAR observations. Results from the proposed methodology for SAR images captured in the HP mode of CP data are shown to compare favourably to observed in situ data of the mixture ratios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".