MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2927467691 · doi:10.1002/cpe.5252

Deep learning models for diagnosing spleen and stomach diseases in smart Chinese medicine with cloud computing

2019· article· en· W2927467691 on OpenAlexaff
Qingchen Zhang, Changchuan Bai, Zhikui Chen, Peng Li, Hang Yu, Shuo Wang, He Gao

Bibliographic record

VenueConcurrency and Computation Practice and Experience · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAI in cancer detection
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloud computingComputer scienceSpleenStomachDeep learningModern medicineTraditional Chinese medicineArtificial intelligenceMedicinePathologyInternal medicineIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Cloud computing is significantly contributing to the development of smart Chinese medicine. The diagnosis and treatment of spleen and stomach diseases has been arousing great interest in smart Chinese medicine with cloud computing since many persons are suffering from spleen and stomach diseases. Currently, spleen and stomach diseases present some new characteristics with the dramatic changes in natural climate, social environment, and human living habits. Recently, deep learning, together with cloud computing techniques, has successfully used in medical image analysis and therefore it is the most promising model for diagnosing spleen and stomach disease in smart Chinese medicine. In this paper, we present a survey on deep learning models in medical image analysis for computer‐aided diagnosis in modern medicine. Afterwards, we summarize the syndrome types of spleen and stomach diseases and furthermore analyze the causes and pathogenesis for each syndrome. Finally, we discuss the open challenges and research directions of deep learning models applicable to the computer‐aided diagnosis of spleen and stomach diseases, which is expected to contribute to the development of smart Chinese medicine with cloud computing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConcurrency and Computation Practice and ExperienceSame topicAI in cancer detectionFrench-language works237,207