MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2927635446 · doi:10.5539/jmsr.v8n2p10

Molecular Dynamics Study the Factors Effecting the Structure of MgSiO3 Bulk

2019· article· en· W2927635446 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dũng Nguyễn Trọng, Huy Nguyen Quoc

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Materials Science Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMolecular dynamicsMaterials scienceRadial distribution functionDistribution (mathematics)Periodic boundary conditionsCoordination numberThermodynamicsDistribution functionComputational chemistryBoundary value problemPhysicsChemistryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies the effect of atomic numbers (N), N=2000atoms, 3000atoms, 4000atoms, 5000atoms, 6000atoms at temperature (T), T=300K; N=5000atoms at T=300K, 500K, 1000K, 1500K, 2000K, 2500K, 3000K, 3500K; N=5000atoms at T=300K, 2000K with pressure (P), P=0GPa, 20GPa, 40GPa, 60GPa, 80GPa, 100GPa on the structure of MgSiO3 bulk by Molecular Dynamics method (MD) with Born-Mayer potential (BM), periodic boundary conditions. The results were analyzed through the radial distribution function (RDF), coordination number, angle distribution, size (l), energy (E). The results showed that there are the effects of factors on the structure of MgSiO3 bulk. In addition, with the atomic number (N), temperature (T), different pressures (P) at temperature T=300K, 2000K there are the appearance and disappearance of links Si-Si, Si-O, O-O, Si-Mg, O-Mg, Mg-Mg and number of structural units SiO4, SiO5, SiO6, MgO3, MgO4, MgO5, MgO6, MgO7, MgO8, MgO9 , MgO10, MgO11, MgO12

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.358
Threshold uncertainty score0.827

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Materials Science ResearchSame topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207