MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2927949351 · doi:10.1109/lpt.2019.2909016

25 and 50 Gb/s/${{\lambda}}$ PAM-4 Transmission Over 43 and 21 km Using a Simplified Coherent Receiver on SOI

2019· article· en· W2927949351 on OpenAlexafffund
Md. Ghulam Saber, Eslam El‐Fiky, Zhenping Xing, Mohamed Morsy-Osman, David Patel, Alireza Samani, Md Samiul Alam, Kh Arif Shahriar, Luhua Xu, Gemma Vall-llosera, Boris Dortschy, Patryk J. Urban, Fabio Cavaliere, Stéphane Lessard, David V. Plant

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Photonics Technology Letters · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsEricsson (Canada)McGill University
FundersFaculty of Engineering, McGill UniversityFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesInternational Society for Optical Engineering
KeywordsPhysicsOpticsForward error correctionBit error rateTransmission (telecommunications)OptoelectronicsTelecommunicationsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We demonstrate 25 and 50 Gb/s four-level pulse amplitude modulation (PAM-4) transmission over 43and 21-km standard single-mode fiber (SMF), respectively, using a silicon photonic 120° hybrid-based integrated simplified coherent receiver in the C-band. The integrated receiver is composed of an edge coupler, a vertical grating coupler, a polarization splitter-rotator, a 3 χ 3 multimode interference coupler-based 120° hybrid, and three germanium p-i-n photodetectors. For 25 Gb/s PAM-4 transmission, we achieved the receiver sensitivities of -18, -17.5, -16.6, -14.5, and -9.8 dBm in back-to-back (B2B) and after 10.5, 21, 31, and 43 km, respectively, at a bit error rate (BER) below the hard-decision forward error correction (HD-FEC) threshold (i.e., 3.8 ×10-3) without using any receiver equalizer, while for the 50 Gb/s PAM-4 transmission, the receiver sensitivities of -13.6 dBm in B2B, and -13.5 and -11.6 dBm after 10.5 and 21 km are obtained using a 31-tap linear feed-forward equalizer (FFE), respectively. Furthermore, we achieved up to 44 Gb/s receiver equalizer-free PAM-4 transmission over 10.5 km below the HD-FEC. The characterization of the receiver at different wavelengths within the C-band is provided as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Photonics Technology LettersSame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207