MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2927980047 · doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2018.6413

Enabling electricity access: a comprehensive energy efficient approach mitigating climate/weather variability – Part II

2019· article· en· W2927980047 on OpenAlexaff
Ameena Saad Al‐Sumaiti, M.M.A. Salama, Mohamed Shawky El Moursi, Tareefa S. Alsumaiti, Mousa Marzband

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Generation Transmission & Distribution · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectricityGridEnvironmental economicsComputer scienceProbabilistic logicNational GridMains electricityElectricity generationPopulationOperations researchPower (physics)EngineeringEconomicsGeographyElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Population dispersion necessitates grid expansion to meet electricity demand. For many developing countries and remote communities, meeting electricity demand is a challenge due to a power generation shortage and load variability that is highly driven by weather uncertainty. Electric utilities’ practical planning solutions are to disable electricity access from new residential regions, supply at least 10% of the non‐electrified regions, or follow a rotating feeder curtailment such that the new regions are electrified for a few hours daily. This study proposes an alternative framework to plan electricity access more efficiently in developing countries. A probabilistic multi‐stage optimisation framework that first incorporates in‐depth analysis of appliance operational models, second accounts for AC grid codes of operation and third anticipates consumers’ actions is deployed. The framework is formulated to account for climate/weather uncertainty factors. Results show that energy efficiency can reach up to 97%, and the computation time can be improved by 99.6% with respect to the existing current state‐of‐the‐art approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.609
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET Generation Transmission & DistributionSame topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207