Ontologías poéticas diferenciadas en la literatura amerindia : “Braconaje” y decolonialidad.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artículo aborda la poesía amerindia contemporánea a partir de las teorías decoloniales latinoamericanas y examina poemas de dos poetas indígenas: Ariruma Kowii (Ecuador) y Humbert Ak’abal (Guatemala). Primero, se explora el fenómeno literario indígena con los conceptos de heterogeneidad (Antonio Cornejo Polar), colonialidad (Anibal Quijano y Walter Mignolo) y “braconaje” (Simon Harel). Luego, se problematiza la poesía de los dos autores a partir del uso de las lenguas amerindias junto con el castellano y del estatuto del texto que puede interpretarse en su pluralidad semiótica a partir del concepto de semiosis (Walter Mignolo). Finalmente, se muestra cómo los dos autores demuestran una ontología poética propia enraizada en la tradición oral y la cosmovisión de su pueblo. Ese recorrido a través de la poesía de los dos autores demuestra que la poesía indígena contemporánea se inscribe en la decolonialidad del saber.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it