MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2928033049 · doi:10.1002/cjp2.131

A COEUR cohort study of SATB2 expression and its prognostic value in ovarian endometrioid carcinoma

2019· article· en· W2928033049 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Cécile Le Page, Martin Köbel, Liliane Meunier, Diane Provencher, Anne‐Marie Mes‐Masson, Kurosh Rahimi

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Pathology Clinical Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsCalgary Laboratory ServicesUniversité de MontréalUniversity of CalgaryCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéTerry Fox Research Institute
KeywordsOvarian carcinomaValue (mathematics)CohortOncologyMedicineInternal medicineCarcinomaOvarian cancerCancerMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this study was to describe the expression of special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2 (SATB2) in ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (EC). SATB2 is a nuclear matrix-associated transcription factor that is associated with abnormal expression in certain cancers but has not been reported for ovarian carcinoma. SATB2 mRNA and protein expression was first assessed in a pilot cohort of 26 samples by Affymetrix microarray and by routine immunohistochemistry on a small tissue microarray. A large multicenter validation cohort representing the well-characterized cases of 235 ovarian EC from the Canadian Ovarian Experimental Unified Resource (COEUR) was then used to validate this result and to assess the prognostic impact of SATB2 expression. SATB2 staining was scored as negative, weak, moderate, and strong intensity, and by percentage of stained cells. No SATB2 expression was observed in clear cell carcinomas but 10% (n = 3) of the ECs in the pilot cohort showed SATB2 expression. In the validation cohort, strong expression was observed in 11% of ECs, while weak or moderate expression levels were detected in 12% of cases. Evaluation of SATB2 expression with clinicopathological parameters revealed an association with patient age and Federation International of Gynecology and Obstetrics grade but not with disease stage or postoperative residual disease. Any expression of SATB2, independent of intensity, was also associated with longer survival and improved progression-free survival with hazard ratio (HR) = 0.14 (95% CI 0.03-0.56) and HR = 0.16 (95% CI 0.02-1.24) respectively. A greater beneficial effect was observed in patients with stage III/IV disease compared to patients with stage I/II disease. Furthermore, direct comparison of SATB2 with other reported prognostic biomarkers such as progesterone receptor, CDX2 and β-catenin within this cohort showed that SATB2 had the strongest association with survival. Given the current lack of accurate prognostic factors for these patients, SATB2 has promising clinical utility and warrants further study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.327
Threshold uncertainty score0.733

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.438
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Pathology Clinical ResearchSame topicEpigenetics and DNA MethylationFrench-language works237,207