MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2928066095 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834389

Discovery and progenitor constraints on the Type Ia supernova 2013gy

2019· article· en· W2928066095 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieEötvös Loránd TudományegyetemNational Central UniversityPlanetary Science DivisionScience Mission DirectorateNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaYouth Innovation Promotion AssociationSpace Telescope Science InstituteVillum FondenQueen's UniversityAdolph C. and Mary Sprague Miller Institute for Basic Research in Science, University of California BerkeleyUniversity of EdinburghJohns Hopkins UniversityQueen's University BelfastNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationDurham UniversitySmithsonian InstitutionNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhotometry (optics)Light curveSupernovaMarkov chain Monte CarloGalaxyRADIUSSpectral lineMonte Carlo method

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present an early-phaseg-band light curve and visual-wavelength spectra of the normal Type Ia supernova (SN) 2013gy. The light curve is constructed by determining the appropriate S-corrections to transform KAIT natural-systemB- andV-band photometry and Carnegie Supernova Project natural-systemg-band photometry to the Pan-STARRS1g-band natural photometric system. A Markov chain Monte Carlo calculation provides a best-fit single power-law function to the first ten epochs of photometry described by an exponent of 2.16+0.06−0.06and a time of first light of MJD 56629.4+0.1−0.1, which is 1.93+0.12−0.13days (i.e., < 48 h) before the discovery date (2013 December 4.84 UT) and −19.10+0.12−0.13days before the time ofB-band maximum (MJD 56648.5 ± 0.1). The estimate of the time of first light is consistent with the explosion time inferred from the evolution of the Si IIλ6355 Doppler velocity. Furthermore, discovery photometry and previous nondetection limits enable us to constrain the companion radius down toRc ≤ 4 R⊙. In addition to our early-time constraints, we used a deep +235 day nebular-phase spectrum fromMagellan/IMACS to place a stripped H-mass limit of < 0.018 M⊙. Combined, these limits effectively rule out H-rich nondegenerate companions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicGamma-ray bursts and supernovaeFrench-language works237,207