CRESCIMENTO INICIAL DE CLONES DE EUCALYPTUS EM FUNÇÃO DA ADUBAÇÃO DE NPK
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A adubação NPK e a escolha do material genético são fundamentais no estabelecimento e na produtividade da cultura. Assim objetivou-se avaliar o efeito de adubação mineral de plantio, no crescimento de clones de eucalipto (Eucalyptus urophylla x Eucalyptus grandis), em solo de Cerrado. O experimento foi conduzido de outubro de 2015 a julho de 2017, na fazenda Campo Verde IV, localizada no município de Selvíria - MS. O delineamento experimental foi o de blocos casualizados com 12 tratamentos e quatro repetições, em esquema fatorial 3x4, sendo três clones (I144, H13 e 1528) e quatro doses: 0, 160, 320 e 640 kg ha-1 da fórmula 08-32-16 + 0,5% B, 0,5% Cu e 0,5% Zn. Cada parcela foi composta por 42 plantas, distribuídas em sete linhas de seis plantas cada, totalizando 378,0 m2 de área, sendo considerada área útil apenas as seis plantas centrais, totalizando 54,0 m2. Foram avaliados aos 17 meses de idade o diâmetro à altura do peito (DAP) e volume de madeira com casca. A adubação propiciou aumento do DAP e da produtividade de madeira para os três clones, sendo o 1528 mais produtivo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".