MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2928336535 · doi:10.1051/medsci/2019035

Approches nouvelles pour l’étude des interactions protéine-protéine

2019· review· fr· W2928336535 on OpenAlexaff
Benoît Béganton, Étienne Coyaud, Alain Mangé, Jérôme Solassol

Bibliographic record

Venuemédecine/sciences · 2019
Typereview
Languagefr
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiotin and Related Studies
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProteomeComputational biologyProtein–protein interactionHuman proteome projectComputer scienceProteomicsBiologyCell biologyBioinformaticsGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The proteome is a dynamic system in which protein-protein interactions play a crucial role to model together the cellular phenotype. However, given the inherent limitation of the available technologies to depict the dynamic nature of these interactions, identify protein-protein interaction has for a long time represented an important challenge in proteomic. The recent development of BioID and APEX, two proximity-dependent labeling technologies, opens today new perspectives and yet start changing our vision of protein-protein interaction, and more globally our vision of the proteome. In this review, we describe the recent and conventional tools available to study protein-protein interactions, compare the advantages and limitations of these technics, and discuss the recent progress brought by the proximity-dependent labelling to complete our vision of the proteome, and thus better understand cellular mechanisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.920
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemédecine/sciencesSame topicBiotin and Related StudiesFrench-language works237,207