MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2928429719 · doi:10.1177/1934578x1801301017

Antibiotic Mycotoxins from an Endophytic <i>Fusarium acuminatum</i> Isolated from the Medicinal Plant <i>Geum macrophyllum</i>

2018· article· en· W2928429719 on OpenAlexaffabout
Trevor N. Clark, Madison Carroll, Katelyn Ellsworth, Roxann Guérrette, Gilles A. Robichaud, John A. Johnson, Christopher A. Gray

Bibliographic record

VenueNatural Product Communications · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicrobial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
Canadian institutionsAtlantic Cancer Research InstituteUniversité de MonctonUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntimycobacterialFusariumPlant use of endophytic fungi in defenseFermentationBiologyFungusMicrobiologyFood scienceChemistryBotanyMycobacterium tuberculosisMedicineTuberculosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An extract of the endophytic fungus Fusarium acuminatum (TC2-084) isolated from the Canadian medicinal plant Geum macrophyllum exhibited significant antimycobacterial activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Ra when fermented in both malt extract and potato dextrose broths. However, significant differences observed in the NMR spectra of the respective extracts led us to further investigate both. Bioassay guided fractionation revealed that lateropyrone was solely responsible for the bioactivity observed when TC2-084 was fermented in malt extract broth, while the antimycobacterial activity of the extract derived from the isolate fermented in potato dextrose broth was augmented by the presence of enniatins B, B1, and B4 in addition to lateropyrone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNatural Product CommunicationsSame topicMicrobial Natural Products and BiosynthesisFrench-language works237,207