MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2928729856 · doi:10.1002/mmce.21767

3D FSS polarizer for millimeter‐wave antenna applications

2019· article· en· W2928729856 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamad Mantash, Tayeb A. Denidni

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolarizerOpticsWidebandBroadbandAxial ratioExtremely high frequencyTunable metamaterialsCircular polarizationBandwidth (computing)Coaxial antennaLinear polarizationPolarization (electrochemistry)Frequency bandAntenna arrayAntenna gainPhysicsMicrostrip antennaAntenna (radio)OptoelectronicsTelecommunicationsEngineeringMicrostripMetamaterial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, a novel wideband polarizer is presented, to convert the linear polarization of a directive antenna into circular polarization. This innovative polarizer is based on a 3D frequency selective surface (FSS) and consists of an array of 4×4 metal axial-mode helices. The proposed broadband polarizer operates in the 28 to 31 GHz frequency band. To demonstrate the principle, the 3D FSS is applied to a linearly polarized Yagi-Uda antenna operating in the same millimeter-wave frequency band. The measured and simulated results, by integrating the proposed 3D polarizer in front of the antenna, show that an axial ratio smaller than 3 dB is obtained over a wide bandwidth with gain enhancement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided EngineeringSame topicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207