MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2928790165 · doi:10.1038/s41579-019-0187-4

New filovirus disease classification and nomenclature

2019· review· en· W2928790165 on OpenAlexafffund
Jens H. Kuhn, Takuya Adachi, Neill K. J. Adhikari, José Ramón Arribas, Ibrahima Bah, Daniel G. Bausch, Nahid Bhadelia, Matthias Borchert, Arne Broch Brantsæter, David M. Brett‐Major, Timothy Burgess, Daniel S. Chertow, Christopher G. Chute, Theodore J. Cieslak, Robert Colebunders, Ian Crozier, Richard T. Davey, Hilde De Clerck, Rafaël Delgado, Laura Evans, Mosoka Fallah, William A. Fischer, Tom Fletcher, Robert Fowler, Thomas Grünewald, Andy Hall, Angela Hewlett, Andy I. M. Hoepelman, Catherine Houlihan, Giuseppe Ippolito, Shevin T. Jacob, Michael Jacobs, Robert Jakob, Frédérique Jacquérioz, Laurent Kaiser, André C. Kalil, Rashidatu Fouad Kamara, Jimmy Kapetshi, Hans‐Dieter Klenk, Gary Kobinger, Mark G. Kortepeter, Colleen S. Kraft, Thomas Kratz, Henry Kyobe Bosa, Marta Lado, François Lamontagne, H. Cliff Lane, Leslie Lobel, Julius J. Lutwama, G. Marshall Lyon, Moses Massaquoi, Thomas Massaquoi, Aneesh K. Mehta, Vital Mondonge Makuma, Srinivas Murthy, Tonny Seikikongo Musoke, Jean‐Jacques Muyembé‐Tamfum, Phiona Nakyeyune, Carolina Nanclares, Miriam Nanyunja, Justus Nsio-Mbeta, Tim O’Dempsey, Janusz T. Pawęska, C. J. Peters, Peter Piot, C. Rapp, Bertrand Renaud, Bruce S. Ribner, Pardis C. Sabeti, John S. Schieffelin, Werner Slenczka, Moses J Soka, Armand Sprecher, James E. Strong, Robert Swanepoel, Timothy M. Uyeki, Michel Van Herp, Pauline Vetter, David A. Wohl, Timo Wolf, Anja Wolz, Alie Wurie, Zabulon Yoti

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Reviews Microbiology · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral Infections and Outbreaks Research
Canadian institutionsPublic Health Agency of CanadaUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversité de SherbrookeUniversité LavalHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesSunnybrook Health Science Centre
FundersNIH Clinical CenterNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesSchool of Medicine, Emory UniversityUniformed Services University of the Health SciencesCenters for Disease Control and PreventionNational Institutes of HealthRobert Koch InstitutUniversité de ParisUniversiteit AntwerpenHôpitaux Universitaires de GenèveUniversitetet i OsloUniversity of TorontoNational Health Laboratory ServiceMinistero della SaluteNational Cancer InstituteKing's Health PartnersNHLBI Division of Intramural ResearchPublic Health AgencyUniversity of PretoriaNYU Langone Medical CenterFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer ResearchKing's College LondonNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchNational Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research UnitRoyal Free London NHS Foundation TrustUniversity of Nebraska Medical CenterFaculty of Medicine, University of British ColumbiaDepartment of Health and Social CareInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesPublic Health Agency of CanadaPhilipps-Universität MarburgUniversité LavalTulane UniversityEmory UniversityBattelleWorld Health OrganizationUniversité de SherbrookeJohns Hopkins UniversitySchool of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory DiseasesBroad InstituteKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyMassachusetts Institute of Technology
KeywordsEbola virusOutbreakDiseaseBiologyEbolavirusVirologyGenotypeGeneticsMedicinePathologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.440
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations127
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNature Reviews MicrobiologySame topicViral Infections and Outbreaks ResearchFrench-language works237,207