Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
VenueNature Reviews Microbiology · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral Infections and Outbreaks Research
Canadian institutionsPublic Health Agency of CanadaUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversité de SherbrookeUniversité LavalHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesSunnybrook Health Science Centre
FundersNIH Clinical CenterNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesSchool of Medicine, Emory UniversityUniformed Services University of the Health SciencesCenters for Disease Control and PreventionNational Institutes of HealthRobert Koch InstitutUniversité de ParisUniversiteit AntwerpenHôpitaux Universitaires de GenèveUniversitetet i OsloUniversity of TorontoNational Health Laboratory ServiceMinistero della SaluteNational Cancer InstituteKing's Health PartnersNHLBI Division of Intramural ResearchPublic Health AgencyUniversity of PretoriaNYU Langone Medical CenterFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer ResearchKing's College LondonNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchNational Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research UnitRoyal Free London NHS Foundation TrustUniversity of Nebraska Medical CenterFaculty of Medicine, University of British ColumbiaDepartment of Health and Social CareInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesPublic Health Agency of CanadaPhilipps-Universität MarburgUniversité LavalTulane UniversityEmory UniversityBattelleWorld Health OrganizationUniversité de SherbrookeJohns Hopkins UniversitySchool of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory DiseasesBroad InstituteKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyMassachusetts Institute of Technology
KeywordsEbola virusOutbreakDiseaseBiologyEbolavirusVirologyGenotypeGeneticsMedicinePathologyGene
Abstract
fetched live from OpenAlexNo abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.929
Threshold uncertainty score1.000
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
