Grain Protein Content QTLs Identified in a Durum × Wild Emmer Wheat Mapping Population Tested in Five Environments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Wild emmer wheat ( Triticum turgidum ssp. dicoccoides , WEW) was shown to exhibit high grain protein content (GPC) and therefore, possess a great potential for improvement of cultivated wheat nutritional value. A recombinant inbred line (RIL) population derived from a cross between T. durum var. Svevo and WEW acc. Y12-3 was used for construction of a high-density genetic map and genetic dissection of GPC. Genotyping of 208 F 6 RILs with 15K wheat SNP array yielded 4,166 polymorphic SNP markers, of which 1,510 were designated as skeleton markers. A total map length of 2,169 cM was obtained with an average distance of 1.5 cM between SNPs. A total of 12 GPC QTLs with LOD score range of 2.7-35.9, and PEV of 2.6-26.6% were identified under five environments. Major QTLs with favorable alleles from WEW were identified on chromosomes 4BS, 5AS, 6BS and 7BL. The QTL region on 6BS coincided with the physical position of the previously cloned QTL, Gpc-B1 . Comparisons of the physical intervals of the GPC QTLs described here with the results previously reported in other durum×WEW RIL population led to the identification of four common and two homoeologous QTLs. Exploration of the large genetic variation within WEW accessions is a precondition for discovery of exotic beneficial alleles, as we have demonstrated here, by the identification of seven novel GPC QTLs. Therefore, our research emphasizes the importance of GPC QTL dissection in diverse WEW accessions as a source of novel alleles for improvement of GPC in cultivated wheat. Key message Genetic dissection of GPC in tetraploid durum × WEW RIL population, based on high-density SNP genetic map, revealed 12 QTLs, with favorable WEW allele for 11 QTLs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".