MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2929752809 · doi:10.1094/mpmi-10-18-0278-r

<i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> Seedlings Influence <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> Spore Formation

2019· article· en· W2929752809 on OpenAlexaff
Vincent Charron‐Lamoureux, Pascale B. Beauregard

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Plant-Microbe Interactions · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBacillus subtilisSporeBiologyArabidopsis thalianaGerminationEndosporeMicrobiologyInoculationSpore germinationArabidopsisRhizobacteriaBotanyBacteriaBiofertilizerHorticultureBiochemistryMutantGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bacillus subtilis is a Gram-positive plant-growth-promoting rhizobacterium exerting many beneficial effects on plant health. Because they secrete antimicrobial compounds and elicit induced systemic resistance, B. subtilis and phylogenetically related species are of particular interest as antifungals in organic agriculture. These bacteria are also known for their capacity to differentiate phenotypically into endospores able to withstand many environmental stresses. However, although B. subtilis is often inoculated on plants as spores, dynamics of germination and sporulation on roots remain unexplored. Using a hydroponic culture system and a soil system for Arabidopsis thaliana, we observed that B. subtilis spores germinate rapidly on contact with plants. However, the vegetative cells are abundant on roots for only a few days before reversing back to spores. We observed that the germinant receptor GerK and sporulation kinases KinA and KinB identified in vitro control sporulation dynamics on plants. Surprisingly, when plants are inoculated with B. subtilis, free-living cells sporulate more rapidly than plant-associated cells. However, direct contact between plant and bacteria is required for the induction of sporulation in the surrounding B. subtilis. This study has fundamental implications for our understanding of interactions between Bacillus spp. and plants, and particularly for a more efficient usage of B. subtilis as a biofertilizer or biofungicide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Plant-Microbe InteractionsSame topicPlant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityFrench-language works237,207