MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2929869967 · doi:10.32550/teknodik.v0i0.536

MENGINTEGRASIKAN TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI DAN KOMUNIKASI (TIK) KE DALAM PROSES PEMBELAJARAN: Apa, Mengapa dan Bagaimana?

2019· article· id· W2929869967 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Teknodik · 2019
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Methods and Media Use
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hidup dalam era informasi di abad 21 ini merupakan kenyataan. Teknologi informasi dan komunikasi (TIK) telah menjadi bagian yang tidak terpisahkan dari kehidupan era global saat ini. Untuk mendorong kesiapan SDM di era global melalui pendidikan di sekolah, pengintegrasian TIK ke dalam proses pembelajaran perlu dilakukan untuk 1) mengembangkan kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi siswa; 2) mengembangkan keterampilan dalam bidang teknologi informasi dan komunikasi (ICT literacy) itu sendiri; dan 3) untuk meningkatkan efektifitas, efisiensi dan kemenarikan proses pembelajaran. Dalam prakteknya, belum semua guru memahami apa yang dimaksud dengan mengintegrasikan TIK ke dalam proses pembelajaran. Makalah ini memaparkan tentang apa, mengapa dan bagaimana integrasi TIK dilakukan dalam proses pembelajaran di sekolah

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.889
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it