MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2929869967 · doi:10.32550/teknodik.v0i0.536

MENGINTEGRASIKAN TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI DAN KOMUNIKASI (TIK) KE DALAM PROSES PEMBELAJARAN: Apa, Mengapa dan Bagaimana?

2019· article· id· W2929869967 on OpenAlexaff
Uwes Anis Chaeruman

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Teknodik · 2019
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Methods and Media Use
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hidup dalam era informasi di abad 21 ini merupakan kenyataan. Teknologi informasi dan komunikasi (TIK) telah menjadi bagian yang tidak terpisahkan dari kehidupan era global saat ini. Untuk mendorong kesiapan SDM di era global melalui pendidikan di sekolah, pengintegrasian TIK ke dalam proses pembelajaran perlu dilakukan untuk 1) mengembangkan kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi siswa; 2) mengembangkan keterampilan dalam bidang teknologi informasi dan komunikasi (ICT literacy) itu sendiri; dan 3) untuk meningkatkan efektifitas, efisiensi dan kemenarikan proses pembelajaran. Dalam prakteknya, belum semua guru memahami apa yang dimaksud dengan mengintegrasikan TIK ke dalam proses pembelajaran. Makalah ini memaparkan tentang apa, mengapa dan bagaimana integrasi TIK dilakukan dalam proses pembelajaran di sekolah

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0110.009
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal TeknodikSame topicEducational Methods and Media UseFrench-language works237,207