Demystifying the Crowd Intelligence in Last Mile Parcel Delivery for Smart Cities
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent years have witnessed an explosive growth of online shopping, which has posted unprecedented pressure on the logistics industry, especially the last mile parcel delivery. Existing solutions mostly rely on dedicated couriers, which suffer from high cost and low elasticity when dealing with a massive amount of local addresses. Advances in the Internet of Things, however, have enabled vehicle information to be readily accessible anytime anywhere, forming an Internet of Vehicles (IoV), which further enables intelligent vehicle scheduling and management. New opportunities therefore arise toward efficient and elastic last mile delivery for smart cities. In this article, we seek novel solutions to improve the last mile parcel delivery with crowd intelligence. We first review the existing and emerging solutions for last mile parcel delivery. We then discuss the advances of the ride-sharing- based delivery mechanism, identifying the unique opportunities and challenges therein. We further present Car4Pac, an IoV-enabled intelligent ride-sharing-based delivery system for smart cities, and demonstrate its superiority with real trace-driven evaluations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it