MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2931390962 · doi:10.1353/esc.2001.0039

Success ‘Well-earned: Adele ‘Wiseman’s The Sacrifice

2001· article· en· W2931390962 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ruth Panofsky

Bibliographic record

VenueEnglish studies in Canada · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature: history, themes, analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSacrificeAdmirationMemoirCharacter (mathematics)LiteratureOrder (exchange)ArtPhilosophyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The publication of The Sacrifice is reconsidered as the work of a writer who early on came to view herself as a professional. Various sources (interviews, correspondence, memoirs, reviews, and scholarly articles) are used to reconstruct the historical moment that culminated in the publication of The Sacrifice. An analysis of the contemporary response to the novel, furthermore, shows the extent to which Wiseman’s rise as a writer was predicated upon an admiration for her protagonist that was felt powerfully and equally by the author and her first reviewers, who overlooked the “sacrifice” of a female character to affirm patriarchal order.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.721
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnglish studies in CanadaSame topicLiterature: history, themes, analysisFrench-language works237,207