Declaración de inconstitucionalidad, modulación de efectos y buena fe del Estado en Brasil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artículo presenta un estudio del régimen de modulación de efectos de los actos declarados inconstitucionales por el Tribunal Supremo Federal de Brasil, introducido por una ley innovadora en materia de control de constitucionalidad: la Ley 9868/99. La investigación utiliza la técnica de revisión bibliográfica, legislativa y jurisprudencial con los siguientes objetivos: a) demostrar que la naturaleza de la inconstitucionalidad (nulidad y anulabilidad) no impide reconocer efectos a las leyes inconstitucionales, incluso en los regímenes de control que adoptan el dogma de la nulidad del acto inconstitucional; b) proponer una teoría interpretativa de la modulación de efectos centrada en los derechos fundamentales y la dignidad humana, y c) responder, con base en el principio de la buena fe, si el Estado puede, en definitiva, beneficiarse del reconocimiento de efectos de leyes que lesionan derechos fundamentales del sujeto, tales como la libertad y el patrimonio.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".